Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than Galaxy S5 Sport, having a global score of 93.6 against 77.8. The Galaxy S10 5G is a extremely newer and thinner device than Galaxy S5 Sport, although it's a lot heavier. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM. The Galaxy S5 Sport has just a bit better screen than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a really smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Galaxy S10 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 12 MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs a little more than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.