Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 overall score. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is thinner than the Galaxy XCover 5, although it is heavier and was released just a little over a year before. These phones use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a way better screen pixels density and a larger screen.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a way less megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a superior battery life than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.