Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a score of 93.6 against 77.6. Galaxy S10 5G is an noticeably older phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it's lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a quite bigger display and a greater pixel count per inch of display.
The Galaxy S10 5G shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot less mega pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S10 5G has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.