Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 502 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. The Galaxy S10 5G is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Samsung was able to make it way lighter and way thinner anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel count in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same camera aperture and a 0.39 inches sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy S10 5G has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Galaxy S10 5G have similar batteries duration.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.