Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. Even when Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro were released only 9 months apart, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is somewhat lighter and notably thinner. Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 11 operating system.
Galaxy S10 5G features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen, a little larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Galaxy S10 5G has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.