Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 overall score. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design is older, just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a bit greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, both have equal internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better performance than Galaxy S10 5G. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip's camera is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's camera, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in low light environments, they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same resolution camera, the same sensor size and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.