Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 5G's overall score of 92.3. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS, so both should give very similar operating system features. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a better cellphone than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, we must highlight that it's also an older, a little bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's memory capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as Galaxy S10 5G's one, they have exactly the same internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S10 5G. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has greater battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's camera is just as good as the camera in Galaxy S10 5G, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same resolution camera, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and a same size back-facing camera sensor.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.