Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-16 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a 93.6 score against 79. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is newer and notably thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is also somewhat heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a way smaller display, a lot worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a just a bit lower pixels amount in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a way smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher 19 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 57% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.