Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S10 Lite's 89.7 score. Even though Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot heavier than the Galaxy S10 Lite, it's just a little thinner and newer. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a quite better 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S10 Lite has much more memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a way smaller aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4352mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S10 Lite. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy S10 Lite, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.