Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-02-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the Google Pixel 3, having a general score of 89.7 against 80. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is newer, but much heavier and just a little thicker than the Google Pixel 3. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number per screen inch. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back, faster video frame rates and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.