Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Google Pixel 3a, having an 89.7 score against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a much heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3a, but both are equally thin. The Google Pixel 3a has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rates, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way bigger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.