Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's global score of 78.9. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a heavier phone than Google Pixel 3a XL, but both of them are 0.32inches thick. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs, a lot more MP back camera and faster video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.