Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4, with an 89.7 score against 81.9. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite body has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4, but it is heavier. Google Pixel 4 and Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite both count with really similar processing units, and although the Google Pixel 4 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61 percent larger battery size. Galaxy S10 Lite shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates, a much larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.