Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's global score of 82.9. The Galaxy S10 Lite body has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4 XL, but it is just a little bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040px resolution and a greater pixels count in each inch of display.
Google Pixel 4 XL's processing unit is very similar to Galaxy S10 Lite's processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3700mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a way more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.