Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, having an 89.7 score against 87.5. The Galaxy S10 Lite design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but it's a little bit heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little better pixel count in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.