Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is better than HTC One M9, having an 89.7 score against 77.7. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is notably newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One M9's, although it is also heavier. HTC One M9 has a bit better processor than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bit CPU.
HTC One M9 has a brighter screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel count in each inch of screen. The Galaxy S10 Lite shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has better video frame rate, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is way more expensive than HTC One M9, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.