Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-03 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the LG G7 ThinQ, with an 89.7 score against 81. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite body is newer, but a little thicker and heavier than LG G7 ThinQ. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better hardware performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy S10 Lite captures much clearer photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot more expensive than LG G7 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.