Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, having a score of 89.7 against 82.7. Galaxy S10 Lite's body is just a little lighter and a little thinner than the LG G8X ThinQ, even when they were released only 3 months apart. The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count per display inch.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite and the LG G8X ThinQ count with similar CPUs, and although the LG G8X ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S10 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much more MP camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit longer battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs more than LG G8X ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.