Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Titan gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 279.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than LG K92, having a global score of 89.7 against 85.4. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than LG K92, even though it was released about 9 months before. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit faster processing unit than LG K92, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better looking screen than LG K92. Both have a greater amount of pixels per display inch, a display of the same size and the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better camera than LG K92, although it has a lower (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with way less megapixels and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size.
LG K92 counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.