Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Glass and Metal | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is better than LG V10's overall score of 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also a little thinner and just a bit lighter than LG V10. The LG V10 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher count of pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a quite better hardware performance than LG V10, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures better pictures and videos than LG V10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures in low light situations and lower 60 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much more MP camera in the back and a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than LG V10, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10 Lite is also cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.