Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-03 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is a little bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's overall score of 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite body is newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, although it's heavier and a little thicker. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V30S ThinQ has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rate, a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S10 Lite is also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.