Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2020-02-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ's general score of 81.3. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ's processing unit is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's processor, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, faster video frame rate and a way larger camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better storage for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with greater battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs a bit more than the LG V35 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.