Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a general score of 89.7 against 81.2. Galaxy S10 Lite's body is newer, but a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than LG V40 ThinQ. The LG V40 ThinQ's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy S10 Lite captures better photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit more memory to install applications and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.