Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is a bit better than LG V60 ThinQ's general score of 87.6. Galaxy S10 Lite is a lighter and just a little thinner device than LG V60 ThinQ, although they were released with only 2 months difference. The LG V60 ThinQ and Galaxy S10 Lite count with similar displays, although the LG V60 ThinQ also has a bit greater pixel density, a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a quite larger screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ's processor is just as good as Galaxy S10 Lite's CPU, both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The LG V60 ThinQ features a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and/or video in low light environments, a much lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a lot lower resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.