Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is a little bit better than LG Velvet's 87.1 score. Although Galaxy S10 Lite is a better cellphone than LG Velvet, we must note that it's also just a little thicker and a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S10 Lite and the LG Velvet have very similar displays, although the LG Velvet also has a quite larger screen, a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460.
LG Velvet has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have a same size sensor, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a 48 mega pixels, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit more expensive than LG Velvet, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.