Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 overall score. Despite being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite body is notably older, just a little heavier and a little thicker than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a camera with less mega-pixels, a way smaller back-facing camera sensor, a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos and a worse video definition.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.