Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Interstellar Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with an 89.7 score against 83.4. Galaxy S10 Lite is an incredibly older device than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it's just a little lighter and just a little thinner anyway. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite. They have a higher pixels count per display inch, a screen of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos, a higher resolution back facing camera and a larger camera aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.