Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with an 89.7 score against 81.9. Galaxy S10 Lite is a a little bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but both of them are equally thin. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a quite better count of pixels in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and videos in poorly lited environments, a worse 48 mega pixels resolution camera, a lower (4K) video definition and a way tinier camera sensor taking way worse quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.