Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting an 89.7 score against 86.3. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's design has the same weight and thickness than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. Both of them have a same size screen, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way smaller diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels and a lot smaller sensor which provides a much worse photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery performance is just as good as the battery life in Galaxy S10 Lite.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.