Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's global score of 87.1. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite construction is just a little thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. Both of them have the same screen density, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a screen of the same size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video, a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a battery performance that is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy S10 Lite.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.