Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPS |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Motorola Moto G 5G, with an 89.7 score against 81.5. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is older than Motorola Moto G 5G, it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit faster processing unit than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G. Both of them have the same pixel density, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a display of the same size. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 48 mega pixels back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher video frame rates.
Moto G 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.