Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Surfing blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than Moto G 5G Plus, with an 89.7 score against 82.6. The Galaxy S10 Lite is a lighter and just a bit thinner phone than the Moto G 5G Plus, although both of them were released with only 5 months difference. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a display that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's display, and although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a little bit higher display density and a bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution, they both have a same size screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S10 Lite takes a little bit better videos and photos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have a same size sensor, a camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.