Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Smoke black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the Moto G Power, with an 89.7 score against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite body is just a bit lighter and thinner than the Moto G Power, even though both of them were released only a couple months apart. Galaxy S10 Lite has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Power, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G Power features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent more battery size. Galaxy S10 Lite takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way larger camera sensor, better 60 fps video frame rate and a way higher resolution camera.
Galaxy S10 Lite is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.