Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-06-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Cosmic Emerald |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 279.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s global score of 82.1. Galaxy S10 Lite's body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), although it was released only 17 months before. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a just a little higher display density.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy S10 Lite features just a bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.