Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G71 5G's 82.9 general score. Despite of the fact Galaxy S10 Lite is older and a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G71 5G, it's body is still a bit thinner. The Galaxy S10 Lite features just a bit better processing power than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM.
Motorola Moto G71 5G and Galaxy S10 Lite have quite similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto G71 5G has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite higher display density. Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and a back-facing camera with a worse 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G71 5G features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.