Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is better than Motorola Moto G84's 80.9 score. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better performance than Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Moto G84 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Moto G84, because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP resolution, a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and a lot smaller back camera sensor capturing lot lower quality pictures and videos, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Moto G84 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.