Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 279.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is noticeably newer than the Moto Z Force, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Moto Z Force features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better count of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rate and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite costs a bit more money than the Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.