Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-02-03 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 279.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a general score of 89.7 against 77.4. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is noticeably thicker and heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video definition and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.