Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-02-03 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a global score of 89.7 against 77.4. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is extremely newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, although it's a lot thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 Lite features a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and faster video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a way better battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs more than the Moto Z2 Play, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.