Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-02-03 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. Galaxy S10 Lite's body is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto Z3 has a screen that is just as good as the screen in Galaxy S10 Lite, because although the Moto Z3 has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a bit greater display pixels density. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite takes a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a camera in the back with a way better resolution, better video frame rate and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Moto Z3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.