Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-02-03 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 general score. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit more memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a much longer battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.