Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Oxford blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than the Motorola One 5G, having a score of 89.7 against 84.6. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a just a little thinner and lighter device than the Motorola One 5G, even when both of them were released with only 8 months difference. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One 5G features a display that is just as good as Galaxy S10 Lite's display, and although the Motorola One 5G has a just a little higher screen pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 resolution, they both have a same size display. The Motorola One 5G has as much memory for apps and games as the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, both of them have exactly the same internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S10 Lite takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, a same resolution camera in the back and the same video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better video frame rate.
Motorola One 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.