Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPS |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is just a bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, getting an 89.7 score against 81.6. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is older than the Motorola One 5G Ace, it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have the same screen pixel density, an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution and a screen with the same size.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S10 Lite is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.