Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Motorola One Action, having an 89.7 score against 78.5. Even though the Galaxy S10 Lite and the Motorola One Action were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy S10 Lite's body is just a bit heavier but also somewhat thinner than the Motorola One Action.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory. Motorola One Action has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a just a little greater pixels density.
Motorola One Action's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite one, both of them have an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and the same internal memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with better battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a very superior camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.