Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a global score of 89.7 against 79.8. Even though Galaxy S10 Lite and the Motorola One Hyper were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy S10 Lite is a little thinner and a little lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola One Hyper's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Galaxy S10 Lite one, both of them have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and the same internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a little better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a lower video definition, a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low-light environments and a lot worse resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.