Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020), with a general score of 89.7 against 87. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is a little thicker but a little lighter than the Motorola razr (2020), and both of them were released only a few months apart. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit higher screen density, a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola razr (2020). Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 Lite features a slightly better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, a 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better video frame rates.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.