Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Ocean |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a global score of 89.7 against 83.1. Galaxy S10 Lite is a lighter and just a little bit thinner device than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, although both were only released 3 months apart. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater display density and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back camera with a 48 megapixels resolution and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments and a lot larger sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.