Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, having an 89.7 score against 79.4. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it's lighter. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, although it has a quite smaller display, a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite worse display density.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality, a worse resolution back-facing camera, a worse (4K) video resolution and a tinier camera aperture. Galaxy A35 5G has a little better battery life than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.