Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's 89.7 overall score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52 is newer than the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, it is just a little bit thicker and a little heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a screen that's very similar to the display in Galaxy S10 Lite, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52's battery lifetime is very similar to Galaxy S10 Lite's battery duration. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality photographs, a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera and a larger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.