Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than Galaxy S10 Lite, getting a 91.3 score against 89.7. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is newer than the Galaxy S10 Lite's, although it's just a little bit thicker and a little heavier. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S10 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G have quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite greater pixels amount per display inch. Galaxy A52 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality pictures, a back facing camera with much more MP and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite have similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.